It's the second day Battlefield: Bad Company has been out and I haven't been able to put it down. Many gamers have complained about being in a rut after Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare came out. With reason though, COD4:MW was one of the best games of last year and it's multiplayer was simply outstanding. I believe the new Battlefield game is a remedy for this rut!

Released for the PlayStation 3 and the Xbox 360, BF:BC is a first-person shooter developed at EA DICE. You can't really compare previous Battlfield games to this one, they've revamped the series and added a few changes.



Along with being absolutely gorgeous, the environment is almost entirely desctructable (almost 90% including buildings, plants, trees, vehicles, and even the ground). There's even an achievement for cutting down a small forest. You'll understand when you're sitting in a gun turret and the trees are falling around you.

In the single player campaign you play as a rookie soldier named Preson Marlowe in 222nd Army battalion, "B" Company (Also known as "Bad" Company). Marlowe is put in this unit of insubordinates, hellraisers, and troublemakers that won't fit in in any other units. He's accompanied by pyromaniac Haggard, talkative Private Sweetwater, and Sergeant Redford who is there for early retirement. Everything goes downhill when Bad Company realizes the enemy are mercenaries who are being paid with gold bars, with this knowledge BC goes AWOL on a mission of personal greed to find more of these gold bars. You don't exactly have to find the gold bars, as it's not a required task. (much like COD4's intel and Halo3's skulls).



Gold Rush is the only multiplayer mode released at launch with BF:BC, but there is rumors about possible downloads for more content. Multiplayer supports up to 24 players and is set up as Attackers vs. Defenders.

For the attackers, the main objective is to destroy all the gold crates. Destroying two crates moves to you the next base.
For the defenders, protecting the bases that houses the gold is the objective and bringing the attackers lives to zero.

I personally haven't come across any major issues with the game. The camera angle is smooth, switching weapons and other tools becomes second nature, and even the driving is very smooth. I know it's a bold statement, but this game is on par with Call of Duty 4. I recommend this game, if not for the multiplayer-- for the single-player.

Comments [78]

post a comment

Cryptoman

Fair review. I read the review at IGN - they seemed to think the graphics were simply good. From what I"ve seen the graphics are amazing!

klasco

i can't wait to start playing this on live just have to wait one more day...sucks being Tasmanian grrr

CQC_NastyN8

-_- you guys still haven't done a review of MGS4, but you have one of BAD COMPANY! No love for METAL GEAR at all wow. Instead we get a review done by Zero punctuation which is fine an all,but I honestly expected you girls to pick up this game and give it a try. Don't come to the site to see what YAHTZEE thinks I come to this site to see what you girls think. I've been bugging about this game and review for a wile now and I'm disappointed I must say. I'm starting to believe you game girls have no love for Sony because most of the topics are wii/360 related.

V1OLENTJ

battlefield plays like a N64 game compared to mgs4
battlefield's gameplay mechanics are quite shallow

bunnyXablaze

Excuse me? This review isn't comparing MGS4 to anything. It's talking about Battlefield: Bad Company and at times COD4.

You know what? I hate the Metal Gear Solid series. I'm a freakin' die hard Splinter Cell fan.

So CQC_NastyN8, Battlefield: Bad Company came out on the fuckin' PS3. I did a review on fucking Haze. You have NO FUCKING RIGHT to say we dislike Sony. I own a fuckin' PS3.

V1OLENTJ, you're just pathetic for even saying that.

Don't post your shit on my articles again. This article is about a game that came out for BOTH NEXT GEN SYSTEMS. Not just the 360.

Grow the fuck up.

sonyboy69

dont know how to quote but Cryptoman.............the graphix are ok (played on a 42' 720p philips HDTV @ friends). i just find this game OK. who knows tho? maybe its b/c im hot off the heals of MGS4? maybe its b/c my interest in FPS's are @ a minimum till RFOM2 comes out? who knows.....what i DO know is the only thing that had me interested in this game @ all was the smile face tag on the grenade

mitjmac

WOOT! To bunnyXablaze for telling off the immature pricks. It's about time someone who wrote the article did something like that.

What were their points? On a review for BF:BC who gives a crap about MGS4? If I wanted info on that game I'd go look up the other dozen or so reviews for it not like it's lacking in the review dept. Seeing as how this site "Gamegirl" is not a major source for reviews for all games, why are is that person ever crying about it.

If a MGS4 review does ever get posted lets just sum it up for the person who played it and probably liked it. "The Game was good" their the damn thing got reviewed.

sonyboy69

bunnyXablaze.....u gotta chill out lady. u whiln the fuck out right now. its ashame u hate the MGS series tho b/c MGS4 truly is a masterpiece. best game i have EVER played on ANY platform. it doesnt play like the past games either an emphasizes playing it ANY way u want ranging from steath to run and gun. theres like 50+ different medals u can possibly get. i got the Eagle somethn medal for headshots. Splinter Cell is MAD boring (understatement) imo and has NO depth to its stories. the new game (from the gameplay footage posted by some1 who wanted it on gamepro) looks MAD boring and outdated. Splinter Cell died @ Pandora Tomorrow for me (last SC game i bought). played Chaos Theory but it was mehhh for me. played Double Agent @ a friends and it was a done deal.

sonyboy69

but HEY, if it makes u feel ANY better, i just fucked some heav guys day up w/ the needle gun in Team Fortress 2 and i havnt played w/ ya girl Raychul on psn yet and i was REALLY looking forward to layn a beat down on her in MGO :(

TheGamesta

Wow you guys are taking this way to seriously - specifically NastyN8. I know your curious as to what the girls may think of MGS4, but don't come to a Battlefield review and complain about it or turn this into yet another trite console flame war.

Why even bring up MGS4 in the first place?? The fact that bunnyXablaze didnt even mention MGS4 at all in the review then for you and V10lentJ to bring it up only tells me that either 1. You're both trolls, or 2. You're both MGS fanboy. It's quite possibly both. How exactly does a N64 game stereotypically play? I know for a fact there are N64 games that have had some incredible gameplay mechanics. Your statement makes no sense.

Either way it was a decent write-up. The only thing I'm hesitant about believing was the single-player being on par with COD4, which is quite possibly the best FPS single-player experience I've ever had. I would get BF: Bad Company for the multiplayer, but unfortunately it doesn't top the franchise's PC entries. And I still play BF1942 DC Final and BF2 on a regular basis. Bad Company will most likely be a rent for me. Or atleast until I can grab it for 20-30 bucks.

Post a Comment